Wind Power in New England: Benefits to Local Communities (2007)

Wind power can offer large economic benefits to host communities, while also helping to improve the environment. New jobs, more money for towns and schools, cleaner air and water, a more reliable electricity supply, and stable energy prices are just some of the many potential benefits. However, new wind power projects sometimes face challenges at the local level because communities are often unaware of the many benefits the project can provide.

New England has installed only a handful of wind turbines to date. Based on the strong, positive feedback coming from the three New England communities that host wind turbines—Hull and Princeton, MA, and Searsburg, VT—it is time to examine the benefits more closely.

More Secure and Reliable Energy

More than 60 percent of New England’s electricity is generated using fossil fuels—natural gas, coal, and oil—with another 25 percent generated from nuclear fuel. In Massachusetts alone, these fuels comprise nearly 95 percent of total electricity generation. However, New England does not have its own supply of coal, oil, natural gas, or nuclear fuel, so most of the region’s power plants rely on imported fuel, increasing the risk of fuel shortages or cutoffs. The operators of the electrical grid are particularly concerned about potential natural gas shortages, especially during winter cold spells when gas is also needed for heating. Due to this concern, the region is becoming increasingly dependent on imports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from other countries.[1]

Using wind energy generated within the state and region keeps energy dollars in the local economy, instead of sending them out of the state and country. It also reduces the risk of supply cutoffs or shortages, and allows us to become more energy independent.

More Stable Energy Costs

Fuel prices change frequently and are hard to predict. The low cost of natural gas in the 1990s led New England energy companies to build many new natural gas-fired power plants. Since then, however, peak gas prices have surged more than 400 percent, and are expected to remain very high, at least through 2012.

Most of the cost of making electricity from the wind is in purchasing and installing the turbines. After that, the “fuel” is free and operating costs are very low. Communities that own their turbines, such as Hull and Princeton, can reduce and stabilize electricity bills for their residents. Private developers generally offer long-term fixed price energy contracts to communities or customer groups, or utilities.[2] Whether a wind project is municipally or privately owned, the end result is more stable prices to consumers.

A Boost to Local Economies

In addition to stabilizing fuel costs for utilities, residents, and businesses, wind power projects can generate significant economic benefits to local economies.
These benefits include:

Revenue. Local governments receive property and income tax revenues, or annual payments in lieu of taxes, from wind project owners. As town services such as water or sewage aren’t needed to operate a wind farm, the payments from wind projects can help towns improve or expand their community services.

Income. Property owners often receive lease payments and/or production royalties for use of a portion of their land, and because wind turbines take up very little space (two percent or less of the land area needed for a wind farm is occupied by wind turbines, access roads, and other equipment),[3] the surrounding land can still be used for other purposes such as agriculture or recreation. Depending on the size of the wind turbine and project terms, annual lease payments to landowners can range from $2,000 to $5,000 per megawatt (MW),[4] with additional royalties based on a percentage of the project’s annual revenues.

Jobs. Wind power generates 40 to 160 construction jobs per 100 MW of generating capacity[5] or about 1 to 2 jobs per 1.5 MW turbine. Site preparation, component manufacturing, and installation of electrical lines are sometimes contracted to local businesses, while construction workers from inside and outside the region spend their earnings on housing, restaurants, and retail establishments within the community. Once constructed, roughly 10 to 25 permanent jobs are created to operate and maintain every 100 MW of generating capacity.[6]

Property values. A national study of more than 25,000 real estate sales near wind farms across the country ound no evidence of a negative impact on property values, and in some cases it even showed a positive effect.[7] In the coastal community of Hull, MA, property sales near Hull Wind One since it began operating in January 2002 show increases in property value consistent with the rest of the town, according to local realtors.[8]

A long-standing real estate firm serving Hull and the neighboring towns of Cohasset and Hingham highlights Hull Wind One in its sales materials, touting the far-sighted thinking that the use of wind power represents, the stable electricity rates it provides, and the overwhelming town support for a second turbine, which was erected in 2006.[9]

Tourism. The experience of existing wind projects in New England and other locations is that they increase tourism activity. Summer tours of the Searsburg, VT, wind project are regularly filled, and Hull Wind One similarly attracts many visitors year-round.[10] As with tourists to other attractions, turbine visitors are likely to generate additional revenue for the community by patronizing local shops and restaurants during their trip.

Cleaner Air and Water

Power plants are a leading source of environmental pollutants, including sulfur dioxide (SO2), which causes acid rain; nitrogen oxides (NOX), which contribute to smog and acid rain; carbon dioxide (CO2), the main heat-trapping gas that causes global warming; and mercury and other toxic chemicals that contaminate lakes and streams. These pollutants are also a public health concern; soot and smog can cause or aggravate asthma and other respiratory problems, and mercury is a potent neurotoxin that can cause birth defects. In addition,
mining and transporting fossil fuels, and disposing of mining and power plant wastes, causes pollution and destroys animal and plant habitat.

Wind turbines, on the other hand, produce electricity with no air or water pollution and generate no harmful wastes. And when wind energy is added to the electrical grid, less electricity is needed from other power plants, so they burn less fuel.

Public Support

In the two Massachusetts towns with wind turbines, Hull and Princeton residents voted by a 2–1 and 3–1 margin, respectively, to build more turbines in their towns. In Searsburg, VT, home to one of New England’s largest wind projects, support for the project increased from 65 percent before it was built to 83 percent afterward.[11] More recent polls indicate that 81 percent of Vermonters would find wind turbines on the mountain ridges acceptable or even beautiful.[12] These favorable opinions clearly reflect the positive contributions and benefits of wind projects, which have become a source of local pride.


[1] Conaway, C. 2006. The challenge of energy policy in New England. Boston, MA: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. April.
[2] In Massachusetts, communities can choose to “opt out” of basic service from their local electric utility and contract with generators themselves. Twenty-one communities in Cape Cod, for example, have formed Cape Light Compact
[3] American Wind Energy Association (AWEA). The most frequently asked questions about wind energy.
[4] The average turbine size is 1.5 MW for large wind power projects, so per turbine lease payments can be higher. Annual lease payments to landowners in New York State (the Fenner Wind Project and the Maple Ridge Wind Project), for example, are more than $6,000 per turbine. Interview of Terry Thisse, Martinsburg, NY Town Supervisor, February 24, 2006.
[5] National Renewable Energy Laboratory. 2005. Wind Energy for Rural Economic Development. Presented at Windpower 2005, May 18.
[6] Ibid.
[7] Renewable Energy Policy Project. 2003. The effect of wind development on local property values. May.
[8] Beck, D. 2004. How Hull Wind “I” impacted property values in Pemberton. July 28. Memo to Chris McCabe, town manager, Town of Hull. David Beck is assistant assessor for the Town of Hull.
[9] Jack Conway & Company, Realtor. 2005. Conway on the Coast, Volume 4.
[10] Hull Municipal Light Plant, telephone correspondence with Fern Coyle, July 2006.
[11] Clinton Solutions. 1997. Public acceptance study of the Searsburg wind power project: Year one post construction. December.
[12] ORC Macro. 2006. Public opinion poll on wind energy. January.

We Need Your Support
to Make Change Happen

We can shift our nation away from dirty fossil fuels and toward cleaner, renewable sources of power—but not without you. Your generous support helps develop science-based solutions for a healthy, safe, and sustainable future.