Points of Reference: Finding Common Ground Among Reference Level Approaches to Move REDD+ Forward (2011)

April 2011
Setting deforestation reference levels is a complex and contentious issue. But we should not let it delay REDD+ implementation.

Policies for reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation combined with related pro-forest activities (REDD+) can play a major role in combating climate change. The technical aspects of REDD+ still need to be worked out, including the contentious issue of setting deforestation reference levels (i.e., the quantities of emissions below which countries receive REDD+ credits). While many reference level approaches are based on past emissions (i.e., the national historical baseline), some approaches also include “expected” emissions either by (a) comparing a country’s emissions to a global average or (b) calculating the amount of carbon stock present in a given country.

A few key points emerge when the various reference level approaches are compared:

  • National historical baselines offer a good starting point. But in order to reduce “leakage”—a shift of carbon-emitting activities to a different region or country that results in no global emissions reduction—reference levels should include incentives to encourage participation by historically low-deforesting countries.
  • The differences between proposed reference level approaches are small in terms of emissions reductions and cost.
  • The risks of not enacting REDD+ are great.
  • Policy makers should decide on a reference level approach quickly in order to move ahead with REDD+ as soon as possible.

Download the full report by clicking on the link at the top of this page to learn more.

We Need Your Support
to Make Change Happen

Your contribution puts rigorous scientific analysis to work to advance clean, renewable energy and so much more. With the support of people like you, we are developing and implementing practical solutions to build a healthier environment and a safer world.