Great Lakes Michigan Agriculture

Great Lakes Communities and Ecosystems at RiskThe Regionspacer
Confront the Challenge
• Climate in the Region
• The Report
• Technical Background
• For Teachers

Explore the Impacts
• Overview
• Migrating Climates
• Water Resources
• Sense of Place

Discover the Solutions
• Overview
• Solutions where we Live
• Reducing our Emissions
• Managing our Response
• Ten Personal Solutions

spacer spacer
Climate Change in Michigan
Climate Projections
Forests & Wildlife
Human Health
Lakes, Streams, & Fish
Property and Infrastructure
Recreation & Tourism
Water Supply & Pollution
Wetlands & Shorebirds
Climate Solutions
Resources & Links

Climate Change Impacts:

Michigan agriculture ranks first nationwide in the production of red tart cherries, blueberries, cranberries, and blackbeans. The state is also a significant producer of soybean, corn, dairy, and livestock. There are likely to be some positive impacts for agriculture resulting from a warmer climate, although current evidence suggests that the negative consequences could outweigh the positive. In general, however, regional development, technological advances, and market fluctuations have as much influence on farmers as the climate.

Changes in temperature, precipitation cycles and severe weather will have many effects upon farming in Michigan. Among the potential impacts of climate change with implications for agriculture in Michigan are:

  • A Shift in Optimal Weather Conditions
    Overall, optimal weather conditions are expected to shift northward and eastward in the Great Lakes region, potentially benefiting northern states such as Michigan. Shifts in the distribution of agriculture, however, may be constrained by thin and acidic soils.

  • Changes in Crop Yield
    Increased atmospheric carbon dioxide and nitrogen, as well as a longer growing season, could boost yields of some crops, such as soybeans and corn. However, higher ozone concentrations can damage soybeans and horticultural crops, countering positive impacts of a warmer climate. In addition, severe storms and floods during the planting and harvest seasons could decrease crop productivity. Hotter and drier summers and potentially more droughts would hurt crops and may require irrigation of previously rain-fed crops, increasing the costs for farmers as well as increasing the pressures on water resources.

  • More Favorable Conditions for Some Pests
    Warmer winters with longer freeze-free periods, shifts in rainfall, and extended growing seasons may create more favorable conditions for pests. More southerly pests, such as corn earworms, may expand northward. Such a shift already appears to be happening with bean leaf beetles, which feed on soybeans and serve as vectors for a virus that causes disease in soybeans. Warming will increase the rate of insect development and the number of generations that can be completed each year, contributing to a build-up of pest populations. Increased pests may drive farmers to use more pesticides or related chemicals, placing an additional burden on water quality.

  • An Increase in Risk for Perennial Crops
    Further climate variability is particularly problematic for perennial crops, such as such as fruit trees and vineyards, because adjustments cannot be made as flexibly and long-term investments are at risk.

  • An Increase in Soil Erosion and Runoff
    Heavy rains and flooding could lead to an increase in farmers' costs to maintain soil fertility as well as contribute to off-site costs, including nutrient overloads and pollution to local water ways. These costs are already estimated at $98 million for the states of Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin.

  • A Decrease in Livestock Productivity
    HolsteinsHigh temperatures suppress appetite and decrease weight gain in livestock, while warmer winters and less snow cover are projected to reduce the quantity and quality of spring forage, overall decreasing milk quality. In addition, any extreme weather events, such as heat waves, droughts, and blizzards, have severe effects on livestock health, although intensively managed livestock operations are better able to buffer the effects of extreme events.

  • An Increase in Risk for Small Farms
    Climate variability will likely pose greater risk for smaller farms and thus may reinforce the trend toward increasing farm size and industrialization of agriculture in the region. These changes will affect local farming communities, and, in turn, change the character of rural landscapes across the state.

Photo Credits:
Moose -- USDA Forest Service, Superior National Forest.
Holsteins -- Bill Tarpenning (Courtesy of USDA).
spacer spacer
Survey the Region
• Overview
• Illinois
• Indiana
• Michigan
• Minnesota
• New York
• Ohio
• Ontario
• Pennsylvania
• Wisconsin


We Need Your Support
to Make Change Happen

We can reduce global warming emissions and ensure communities have the resources they need to withstand the effects of climate change—but not without you. Your generous support helps develop science-based solutions for a healthy, safe, and sustainable future.