Leaders Urge Taking Weapons Off Hair-Trigger Alert

Published Jan 15, 2015

Downloads

The United States has approximately 2,000 deployed nuclear weapons, nearly half of which are kept on “hair-trigger alert.” A relic of Cold War-era nuclear strategy, this hair-trigger status means the weapons can be launched in a matter of minutes. The system was designed to quickly respond to a nuclear attack by the Soviet Union.

As an alarmingly high number of close-calls illustrate, hair-trigger alert increases the risk of an accidental launch, or of a mistaken launch in response to false information. For decades, numerous high-level generals, policy-makers, and presidents have recognized this risk—yet the policy continues.

As a presidential candidate, George W. Bush stated:

[T]he United States should remove as many weapons as possible from high-alert, hair-trigger status—another unnecessary vestige of Cold War confrontation. Preparation for quick launch—within minutes after warning of an attack—was the rule during the era of superpower rivalry. But today, for two nations at peace, keeping so many weapons on high alert may create unacceptable risks of accidental or unauthorized launch.

George W. Bush

President Barack Obama would echo these concerns during his own campaign:

[K]eeping nuclear weapons ready to launch on a moment’s notice is a dangerous relic of the Cold War. Such policies increase the risk of catastrophic accidents or miscalculation. I believe that we must address this dangerous situation…

Barack Obama

General James Cartwright, a Marine Corps four-star general who served as Commander of U.S. Strategic Command under President Bush and Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under presidents Bush and Obama, expressed this in 2012:

The current postures of launch-ready nuclear forces that provide minutes and seconds of warning and decision time should be replaced by postures that allow 24-72 hours on which to assess threats and exercise national direction over the employment of nuclear forces. This change would greatly reduce the risks of mistaken, ill-considered and accidental launch.

General James Cartwright

General William Odom, an Army three-star general and Director of the National Security Agency under President Reagan, said this in 1999:

I don't see why we have the forces [on] alert. I've never been a big enthusiast for our whole approach of being able to launch on warning or launch in a very short amount of time. Firing off 1,000 or 500 or 2,000 nuclear warheads on a few minutes' consideration has always struck me as an absurd way to go to war. … Therefore I think it would make a lot of sense to completely de-alert.

General William Odom

Numerous other leaders have called for an end to hair-trigger alert.

Related resources